Advisor input on the advisor's time
One three-hour meeting cannot hold the thinking of twelve busy specialists, and the PDF sent afterward collects silence. With Onomi, advisors contribute between meetings, on their own schedule, and every comment, annotation, and answer is captured to the record.
Runs on Onomi Adboard today, on the same portal advisors use for live sessions.
Why advisory input evaporates between meetings
Three hours a year of expert time
The board convenes, the discussion is rich, the meeting ends. Ten months of questions pile up for the next slot because there is no channel in between.
Feedback arrives as email prose
The protocol goes out as an attachment, and comments come back as paragraphs in reply threads. Nobody can tell which sentence of page 14 the advisor meant.
Contribution is invisible
Who engaged, how much, and with what: unanswerable. Honoraria are justified by attendance at the meeting, not by the work advisors actually did.
How it works
Contribution on the advisor's time
Boards run evergreen across 2 to 12 months, with discussion feeds carrying the conversation between sessions. Moderation with optional pre-approval keeps posts compliant, digest notifications bring advisors back without nagging, and contribution overviews show moderators who to nudge and when.
Feedback anchored to the evidence
Advisors annotate the document itself: comments pin to the page and the data point, threads carry the multi-advisor discussion in place, and embedded co-creation surfaces support working on shared documents and whiteboards. Structured capture organizes the input by document section, so the medical lead reads consolidated feedback, not forty emails.
Structured asks, not open mailboxes
Questionnaires are scheduled and targeted to advisor subsets, week-by-week to-do lists show each advisor exactly what is due with progress tracked, and materials drip-feed on the program's schedule rather than arriving as one overwhelming folder.
Everything captured, defensibly
Every click, comment, and interaction exports raw for your own analysis, active-time tracking produces the evidence honoraria processes ask for, and the AI-structured executive summary organizes what advisors said. The AI structures; it never writes the medical content.
Featured services
Software is half of it. These are the services our team delivers around this capability.
Advisory delivery models
From self-service boards your team runs to a white-glove package where our team moderates, nudges, and reports across the whole program.
Delivery & services →Onomi Concierge
Program setup, material loading, questionnaire builds, and moderation support handled for you between sessions.
Delivery & services →Where this stops
Contracting and honoraria stay upstream
Advisors arrive contracted through your legal process, and payments run through your systems. Onomi supplies the active-time evidence, never the payment.
The AI structures, never writes
Executive summaries organize what advisors actually said, with the source visible. Medical writing, interpretation, and conclusions stay with your medical team.
"Our advisors will not log into a portal for months."
There is no login to remember: entry is a magic link from the digest email, and each visit shows the advisor exactly what is due. Programs run on scheduled asks and moderator nudges, not on hoping someone checks a portal.
Frequently asked questions
How does document annotation work for advisors?
The advisor opens the document in the portal and comments directly on the page, anchored to the passage or data point. Other advisors reply in thread, and the medical lead reads the consolidated, section-organized result instead of collating emails.
What keeps a months-long board compliant?
Moderation with optional pre-approval on discussion posts, role-based visibility on captured content, and the full record of who said what and when. The same rules that govern the live meeting govern the feed.
What evidence exists for honoraria?
Active-time tracking per advisor, plus the contribution record itself: annotations made, questionnaires completed, discussions joined. It exports as evidence for your fair-market-value and payment processes.
Can we analyze the raw contributions ourselves?
Yes. Every interaction exports raw, usable in your own approved analysis and AI tools. The built-in executive summary is a structured starting point, not a black box.
See a month of advisor work in fifteen minutes
In the demo we walk one advisory cycle: the drip-fed material, a page-anchored annotation thread, a targeted questionnaire, and the structured summary your medical lead receives.
Request a demo