Your most expensive insights shouldn't die in a slide deck
Onomi Adboard runs the full advisory lifecycle — asynchronous discussion and live sessions — with every advisor contribution structured and written to your CRM, at program economics that let tier 2 and 3 boards run self-service.
Where advisory programs leak value
Insights trapped in PDFs
The board convenes, the agency synthesizes, and the output is a report. Six months later, nobody can say what advisors actually contributed — or find it where medical works.
Per-board pricing that never scales
When every advisory board is priced and serviced individually, tier 2 and 3 boards queue behind agency capacity — or don't happen at all.
Live-only formats waste advisor hours
Clinician schedules don't fit a single three-hour call. Without structured asynchronous participation, you pay honoraria for attendance, not contribution.
No trace on the HCP record
An advisor raises a concern about trial methodology and the CRM shows nothing. MSL follow-up depends on someone remembering the meeting.
What advisor input becomes with Onomi
Multi-format advisor engagement
Moderated discussion boards, document co-authoring, anchored PDF annotation with threaded comments, questionnaires as async forms or live polls, and advisor to-do lists with progress tracking.
Live and hybrid sessions built for advisory work
Breakouts for up to 250 attendees, recordings and transcripts, live captioning — running on infrastructure that passes corporate networks without configuration.
Contributions land in the CRM, structured
Bi-directional sync to Veeva and Salesforce: insights captured with context, advisor interactions on the account timeline, and automated MSL follow-up triggered from what was actually said.
Program economics, not per-board invoices
License the program: white-glove delivery on flagship boards, heavy templating and enablement so tier 2 and 3 boards run largely self-service — the backlog stops queueing.
Reporting at three levels
Advisor contribution, per-topic and per-question analytics, and executive summary — with cross-board analytics available across the whole program.
Advisory boards produce the most expensive insight per hour that medical affairs buys — and most of it dies in a slide deck. The board convenes, the discussion is rich, the agency writes it up, and the synthesis lands in a PDF that never touches the CRM. Strategic decisions get made on partial memory of what advisors said.
Onomi Adboard treats the advisor contribution, not the meeting, as the unit of value. Asynchronous discussion boards, annotation, and questionnaires collect input on clinicians’ schedules; live and hybrid sessions handle alignment; and everything — every comment, concern, and answer — is captured structured and written to the Veeva or Salesforce record where medical can act on it.
The second half of the story is economics. Per-board pricing is why tier 2 and 3 boards never scale. Program-level licensing with tiered delivery — white-glove where it matters, templated self-service everywhere else — lets the whole advisory program run on one platform, one data model, and one CRM spine.
Why teams choose Onomi
Insights that outlive the meeting
Advisor contributions land structured on the Veeva or Salesforce record — anchored to the document and question they were raised on — where medical can query them and MSL follow-up triggers automatically. The slide deck stops being the archive.
More contribution per honorarium hour
Asynchronous discussion, annotation, and questionnaires fit clinician schedules, so advisors contribute over days instead of squeezing everything into one call. Live sessions do what only live can: alignment.
Economics that unlock tiers 2 and 3
Program-level licensing with tiered delivery — white-glove on flagship boards, templated self-service for the rest — means the boards that used to queue behind agency capacity simply run.
One view of the whole advisory program
Reporting at three levels — advisor contribution, per-topic analytics, executive summary — plus cross-board analytics, so leadership sees what the advisory spend changed, not just that boards convened.
Frequently asked questions
Where do advisor insights end up?
On the account timeline in Veeva or Salesforce, as structured records — for example, a KOL's concern about trial methodology anchored to the exact document page it was raised on. Medical teams query them like any other CRM data, and MSL follow-up can be triggered automatically.
Asynchronous or live?
Both, in one platform. Boards typically combine moderated async discussion — which fits clinician schedules and deepens contribution — with live or hybrid sessions for alignment. All of it feeds the same structured insight capture.
How does self-service work for smaller boards?
Through templating and enablement: flagship boards get white-glove service, while tier 2 and 3 boards run on pre-built templates your team operates directly. That's the operating model that makes a multi-board program affordable.
How is compliance handled?
The platform inherits Onomi's compliance posture: consented participation, GDPR-aligned HCP data handling, audit trails, SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001. Honoraria contracting and FMV workflows stay with your existing compliance stack.
Where do your adboard insights live six months after the meeting?
If the answer is a slide deck, bring one board's agenda. We'll show the same board run async plus live, with every contribution structured and on the CRM record.
Book a demo